Once educators and administrators are knowledgeable about the science of reading, administrators and a team of curriculum decision-makers may want to determine whether a new core curriculum and/or aligned intervention materials are needed.
The Reading League’s K-5 Curriculum Evaluation Guidelines were intentionally developed to guide this process. They feature scientifically-based sources to alert curriculum selection teams to red flags, which are instructional components not aligned with reading science. They also highlight evidence-aligned practices that are substantiated by the scientific evidence base. It is important to note that there are no curricula featuring all of these practices; it will be up to the knowledgeable selection team to carefully select a program to best suit their needs and supplement if necessary.
Steps to take when using the Curriculum Evaluation Guidelines:
- Assemble a team of knowledgeable stakeholders to identify gaps as well as opportunities to strengthen instruction across grade levels and tiers.
- Evaluate curricula for all components (e.g., word recognition, language comprehension, reading comprehension, writing, assessment) and ensure there is not an over-emphasis of one component of literacy at the expense of another.
Although the Curriculum Evaluation Guidelines were created to guide teams of curriculum decision-makers in evaluating curricula, which is a valuable process, The Reading League recognized that many consumers lacked the time, resources, and/or knowledge to thoroughly evaluate instructional materials. Because of this, The Reading League assembled expert review teams to conduct a large-scale curricula review, resulting in informative Curriculum Navigation Reports based on the Curriculum Evaluation Guidelines. Access the guidelines and reports on the Curriculum Decision-Makers Compass page.
Important: Although many publishers produce excellent, evidence-aligned programs, it is important to build professional knowledge before meeting with them. Knowledgeable curriculum teams can ask important questions during site visits and better evaluate the answers.